Tuesday, August 25, 2020
His first book Fever Pitch was discharged in 1992. ItÃ¢â¬â¢s a self-portraying tale about his over the top help for Arsenal Football Club. High Fidelity Ã¢â¬ his subsequent book and first novel Ã¢â¬ was distributed in 1995. We will compose a custom exposition test on Scratch Hornby: a Long Way Down or then again any comparable point just for you Request Now The epic was adjusted into a film in 2000 and a Broadway melodic in 2006. For his second novel About a Boy (1998) Hornby got the E. M. Forster Award of the American Academy of Arts and Letters. Hugh Grant and Nicholas Hoult featured in the 2002 film adaptation. A Long Way Down was distributed in 2005 in the UK. The book got blended audits from pundits. Johnny Depp purchased the rights to the book before it was even distributed and has since recruited essayist D. V. DeVincentis, who recently composed the content for the film High Fidelity, to compose the screenplay. The story happens in London at some point nowadays. Martin Sharp Ã¢â¬ Martin Sharp is a previous big name. We donÃ¢â¬â¢t know his definite age yet he is in his 40-s. MartinÃ¢â¬â¢s life was great: he had a spouse and two little girls, a generously compensated activity and was fruitful. He was host of a popular show yet Martin tragically slept with a 15 years of age young lady, for which he went through a quarter of a year in jail. This made him much progressively well known as his case was stripped in the yellow press. At the point when he is discharged from jail he finds that his marriage is destroyed. Starting there he works for a satellite TV station with low notoriety and takes part in an extramarital entanglements with Penny, his previous partner. He doesn't put forth an attempt to see his little girls or to explain the strained circumstance with his better half. HeÃ¢â¬â¢s despondent about his circumstance and feels that he has Ã¢â¬Å"pissed his life awayÃ¢â¬ and thatÃ¢â¬â¢s why he needs to take his life. Maureen Ã¢â¬ Maureen is a 51-year-old single parent of a crippled child named Matty. Her entire life is pivoting Matty. She accepts that it is her cross she should bear for her error (Matty was resulting from wedlock). She has driven a totally shut in life for two decades raising him. Before she got Matty she was utilized and active. This has changed in light of the fact that she needs to think about Matty the entire day. She has no opportunity and spare time aside from the administrations at chapel she goes to each Sunday. She needs to dispose of her issues, which appears to be difficult to her. That is the reason she needs to end it all. Jess Crichton Ã¢â¬ Jess is an eighteen-year-old young lady. She doesn't have genuine companions. Jess is an individual who irritates individuals rapidly with her immediate and discourteous character since she says everything that rings a bell. JessÃ¢â¬â¢s father is a neighborhood lawmaker and the family is finished by her mom. Her sister Jen, who is extremely imperative to, to one side the family a couple of years prior and is thought to have ended it all. The entire family, particularly the mother and Jess, are still vexed about it. She needs to end it all by hopping from the pinnacle square due to her family issues and losing her ex however itÃ¢â¬â¢s likewise marginally indiscreet. JJ Ã¢â¬ JJ is an American who came to London with his better half Lizzy. He used to play in a band called Ã¢â¬Å"Big YellowÃ¢â¬ and visited over the entire UK. For Lizzy he surrendered his fantasy about turning into a demigod, the band separated and Lizzy dumped him. Presently he acquires cash by conveying pizza, a reality that he is extremely discontent with. He contrasts his own aspiration for self destruction and the desire of notable performers These four outsiders happen to meet on the top of a high structure called TopperÃ¢â¬â¢s House in London on New YearÃ¢â¬â¢s Eve, each with the purpose of ending it all. Their arrangements for death in isolation, in any case, are destroyed when they meet. In the wake of recounting to their individual stories to the others, they choose to hold off on bouncing and to ensure themselves. Along these lines a gathering of four disastrous and distinctive individuals structures. JessÃ¢â¬â¢ condition not to bounce is that they help her to discover her ex Chas. So they take a taxi and drive to the gathering they assume Chas to be at. In the wake of finding and conversing with Chas they choose to go to MartinÃ¢â¬â¢s place where they discover Penny, who has clearly been crying. After this occasion the press starts to pursue them. The papers guarantee that Martin has laid down with Jess and that they finished up a self-destructive settlement. Jess recommends that they can attempt to benefit from the self-destructive report in the paper. Jess tells a journalist that they saw a holy messenger that resembled Matt Damon, who spared them from bouncing. Due to this senseless falsehood their lives deteriorate. They take some time off together and afterward plan next gathering for Saint ValentineÃ¢â¬â¢s Day. They meet at 8 oÃ¢â¬â¢clock on the top of TopperÃ¢â¬â¢s House on Saint ValentineÃ¢â¬â¢s Day. While they have a discussion, they identify a youngster who is intending to hop from the rooftop. They attempt to prevent him from ending it all however he hops. They are truly shocked. They choose to return home and to meet the next evening. Martin informs them concerning a paper article he read by which individuals who need to end it all need 90 days to beat their aspiration. So they choose to hold up with their choice until the 31st of March. A great deal of occasion occurs during these three months. Things improve a piece. Maureen, JJ and Martin have new openings now. Martin shows students and needs to begin another life, JJ is a busker and is glad to make music again and Maureen works in a paper store. JessÃ¢â¬â¢s associations with her family come to ordinary. The ninety days have passed and they meet before the TopperÃ¢â¬â¢s House once more. They choose to go on the rooftop. On top, while viewing the London Eye they understand that their lives are not all that terrible. They choose to hang tight with killing themselves for an additional a half year. The book is separated into 3 major parts. Also, every enormous part comprises of numerous little ones, each is written in the primary individual portrayal from the perspectives of each character. The language varies essentially starting with one character then onto the next. Jess and JJ utilize a great deal of slang, inconsiderate words. ItÃ¢â¬â¢s intriguing to think about British and American dialects, in this way JJ is an American. In spite of the fact that this is a book around four self-destructive individuals, it is written in rather diverting and clever manner. There are various roar with laughter entries, yet in addition snapshots of genuine deplorability (scenes with Maureen and her child, the self destruction of a youngster) Ideas Jess, Martin, and Maureen can be believed to speak to FreudÃ¢â¬â¢s ideas of the Id, Ego, and Superego. The personÃ¢â¬â¢s change and advancement, defeating troubles and love forever are the principle thoughts of the book. Despite the fact that the adjustments in the characters seem slight, Hornby shows that such changes are frequently the ones that lead to genuine advancement the correct way Step by step instructions to refer to Nick Hornby: a Long Way Down, Papers
Posted by Hanna Schuster at 1:37 PM
Saturday, August 22, 2020
John Keats was probably the best artist of the Romantic Era. He composed verse of incredible erotic magnificence and had an interesting enthusiasm for subtleties. In the course of his life he was not perceived with the senior writers. He didn’t get the regard he merited. He didn’t fit into the regarded bunch due to his age, nor in the more youthful gathering since he was neither a master nor in the high society. He was in the white collar class and around then individuals were dealt with diversely on account of their societal position. John Keats was conceived in London on October 31, 1795. He was instructed at Clarke’s School in Enfield. He delighted in liberal training that primarily pondered his verse. His dad kicked the bucket when he was eight and his mom passed on when he was fourteen. After his mom kicked the bucket, his maternal grandma allowed two London traders, John Rowland Sandell and Richard Abbey, guardianship. Monastery played a significant move in the advancement of Keats, as Sandell just played a minor one. These conditions attracted him amazingly near his two siblings, George and Tom, and his sister Fanny. At the point when he 15, Abbey expelled him from the Clarke School, as he turned into a pharmacist surgeon’s understudy. At that point in 1815, he turned into an understudy at Guy’s Hospital. He enlisted for a six-month course to turn into an authorized specialist. Not long after he concluded he would have been a specialist he understood his actual energy was in ver se. So he concluded he would attempt to exceed expectations in verse too. His verse that he composed six years before his passing was not excellent. As his life advanced his verse turned out to be increasingly full grown and astounding. He admired Shakespeare and Milton. He concentrated a ton of there verse and imitated these two authors. His work looked like Shakespeare. Not long after clinical school, he came back to London and met Leigh Hunt. They started to compose the Examiner, which was love verse. In the course of his life he distributed three books of stanza: Poems (1817), Endymion (1818), Lamia Isabella and different sonnets including two renowned sonnets “Odes'; and “Hyperion.'; Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã Hunt then acquainted him with a hover of scholarly men, including Percy Bysshe Shelley and William Wordsworth. These men impacted him to make his first volume of stanzas, called Poems by John Keats. Shelly endured that he expected to build up a more grounded collection of work before distributing.
Posted by Hanna Schuster at 4:40 AM
Tuesday, August 4, 2020
Five Fun Philosophy Books Many readers think fun philosophy books dont exist. Sure, some are so technical they require a lot of background knowledge, and others are written so poorly that even sympathetic readers give up. But there are great philosophers who are also great writers. They write engagingly, they donât confuse or bore the reader with impenetrable prose, and their words invite questions and even incite wonder. Here are a few of my favorites. The Gay Science by Friedrich Nietzsche (Kaufmann or Nauckhoff translation) You didnât think Iâd lead off with a nineteenth century German philosopher did you? But The Gay Science really is gay, in the sense of free-spirited and joyous. Itâs got aphorisms, epigrams, songs, poemsand the controversial claim that âGod is dead.â Read Nietzscheâs âmost personalâ work for his thoughts on morality, the will to truth, and the courage to really live a life: What, if some day or night a demon were to steal after you into your loneliest loneliness and say to you: This life as you now live it and have lived it, you will have to live once more and innumerable times more; and there will be nothing new in it, but every pain and every joy and every thought and sigh and everything unutterably small or great in your life will have to return to you, all in the same succession and sequenceâ"even this spider and this moonlight between the trees, and even this moment and I myself. The eternal hourglass of existence is turned upside down again and again, and you with it, speck of dust! Would you not throw yourself down and gnash your teeth and curse the demon who spoke thus? Or have you once experienced a tremendous moment when you would have answered him: You are a god and never have I heard anything more divine. Existentialism and Human Emotions by Jean-Paul Sartre On to twentieth century France. Sartreâs summary and defense of existentialism, based on a lecture he gave in 1945. What does it mean to exist as a being who can actually think about my own existence? What does it mean to be âradically freeâ? Sartre asks the kind of questions anyone might have about life, and his answers are often surprising: â¦ man first of all exists, encounters himself, surges up in the world â" and defines himself afterwards. If man as the existentialist sees him is not definable, it is because to begin with he is nothing. He will not be anything until later, and then he will be what he makes of himself. The Sovereignty of Good by Iris Murdoch Like Sartre, Murdoch, an Ireland-born British philosopher, writes about freedom- but unlike the existentialists, she focuses on the imaginative attention we need to make truly free decisions. As she says, âI can only choose within the world I can see.â Todayâs readers might not like her idea that there is such a thing as âthe Goodâ which provides an objective morality, but so many of her observations in these three essays are fascinating even if youâre not committed to her big picture. Like this one: â¦great art teaches us how real things can be looked at and loved without being seized and used, without being appropriated into the greedy organism of the self. The exercise of detachment is difficult and valuable whether the thing contemplated is a human being or the root of a tree or the vibration of a colour or a sound. Unsentimental contemplation of nature exhibits the same quality of detachment: selfish concerns vanish, nothing exists except the things which are seen. Beauty is that which attracts this particular sort of unselfish attention. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life by Sissela Bok Hereâs a modern paradox: we all condemn lies, yet we all lie. What is a lie, anyway? Why do we lie? And at what cost or benefit to ourselves and others? These are Bokâs questions in this very insightful book of applied moral philosophy. She brings in other philosophers ideas and approaches from psychology and political science. âThe moral question of whether you are lying or not is not settled by establishing the truth of falsity of what you say. In order to settle this question we must know whether you intend your statement to mislead.â The Ethics of Identity by Kwame Anthony Appiah This is such a open, inviting book which yet vigorously defends some controversial ideas. If youâre interested in human dignity, in autonomy, in tolerance, in authenticity, in the value of making our own lives while acknowledging our rootedness in culture and identity, this is the book for you. When my father died, my sister and I found a hand-written draft of the final message he had meant to leave us. It began by reminding us of the history of our two families, his in Ghana and our motherâs in England, which he took to be a summary account of who we were. But then he wrote, Remember that you are citizens of the world. He told us that wherever we chose to live and as citizens of the world, we could surely choose to live anywhere that would have us we should endeavor to leave that place better than you found it. Deep inside of me, he went on, is a great love for mankind and an abiding desire to see mankind, under God, fulfill its highest destiny.â Itâs no coincidence that three of authors of these fun philosophy books are novelists, a fourth is a memoirist, and a fifth was a composer and a scholar of poetry. They donât confine themselves to philosophical prose but make use of whatever tools they need from a wide variety of sources. In her response to a critic who called her book a mere âtravelogueâ (as opposed to âreal philosophyâ), Bok, quoting another writer, said that Rainbows, rockets, slivers of mirror, and arrows are important for a good text. I mean by that connections between different times, places, consciousnesses, and aims that point both backwards and forwards. I can accept some confusion and difficult passages in exchange for ârainbows, rockets, slivers of mirror and arrows.â In fact, I think thats a pretty good deal. ____________________ Like chattin up other readers and keeping track of your books on Goodreads? So do we! Come give us a follow. Sign up for True Story to receive nonfiction news, new releases, and must-read forthcoming titles. Thank you for signing up! Keep an eye on your inbox.
Posted by Hanna Schuster at 10:26 AM
Saturday, May 23, 2020
Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 317 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/04/10 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Social Media Essay Did you like this example? In the 21st century social media has made a big impact on society. From young to old it has changed how everything is done. Connecting with others and getting news has never been easier. However, there are also negative effects like cyberbullying or how news may be exaggerated to seem more important than they really are. Considering how easy it is to create an account and click on new story titles many people can be a victim to these problems. Teenagers that are using social media can not only be bullied at school but also online. This can lead to depression and possibility even worse, suicide. In Japan, which has one of the highest suicide rates in the world, a 15 percent rise in suicides between 2008 and 2009 has been blamed on group suicides arranged on internet chat rooms (Williams, 2011). Teenagers may try to escape the bullying by blocking a user however social media platforms like Facebook allows you to message users without being friends with them even when blocked creating a new account is fast and easy. In the worst-case teenagers may resort to suicide to escape the bullying. DonÃ¢â¬â¢t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Social Medias Negative Effects" essay for you Create order Words can be used to evoke emotions. In 2014 there was massive panic about Ebola even though it was an old virus. Dr. Craig Spencer had contracted Ebola while treating patients in Guinea (Stockwell. 2017). He was quarantined before it was contagious and therefore no one else was in danger. However, This did not stop a media explosion declaring an imminent apocalypse. A frenzy of clickbait and terrifying narratives emerged as every major new entity raced to capitalize on the collective Ebola panic (Stockwell, 2017). Ebola was a virus that most people living in the United States had not heard of. Social Media had clickbait titles on how terrifying a disease Ebola was even though it displayed no danger to the public. The clickbait news had advertisements that generated millions of dollars.
Posted by Hanna Schuster at 4:39 AM
Monday, May 11, 2020
The United States v. Susan B. Anthony is a milestone in womens history, a court case in 1873. Susan B. Anthony was tried in court for illegally voting. Her attorneys unsuccessfully claimed that citizenship of women gave to women the constitutional right to vote. Dates of Trial June 17-18, 1873 Background When women were not included in the constitutional amendment, the 15th, to extend suffrage to black men, some of those in the suffrage movement formed the National Woman Suffrage Association (the rival American Woman Suffrage Association supported the Fifteenth Amendment).Ã These included Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Some years after the 15th Amendment passed, Stanton, Anthony, and others developed a strategy of attempting to use the Fourteenth Amendments equal protection clause to claim that voting was a fundamental right and thus could not be denied to women.Ã Their plan: to challenge limits on women voting by registering to vote and attempting to vote, sometimes with the support of the local poll officials. Susan B. Anthony and Other Women Register and Vote Women in 10 states voted in 1871 and 1872, in defiance of state laws prohibiting women from voting. Most were prevented from voting. Some did cast ballots. In Rochester, New York, almost 50 womenÃ attempted to register to vote in 1872. Susan B. Anthony and fourteenÃ other women were able, with the support of election inspectors, to register, but the others were turned back at that step.Ã These fifteen women then cast ballots in the presidential election on November 5, 1872, with the support of the local election officials in Rochester. Arrested and Charged With Illegal Voting On November 28, the registrars and the fifteenÃ women were arrested and charged with illegal voting. Only Anthony refused to pay bail; a judge released her anyway, and when another judge set new bail, the first judge paid the bail so that Anthony would not have to be jailed. While she was awaiting trial, Anthony used the incident to speak around Monroe County in New York, advocating for the position that the Fourteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote.Ã She said,Ã We no longer petition legislature or Congress to give us the right to vote, but appeal to women everywhere to exercise their too long neglected citizens right. Outcome The trial was held in U.S. District Court.Ã The jury found Anthony guilty, and the court fined Anthony $100. She refused to pay the fine and the judge did not require her to be jailed. A similar case made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1875. In Minor v. Happersett,Ã On October 15, 1872,Ã Virginia MinorÃ applied to register to vote in Missouri.Ã She was turned down by the registrar and sued.Ã In this case, appeals took it to the Supreme Court, which ruled that the right of suffrageÃ¢â¬âthe right to voteÃ¢â¬âis not a necessary privilege and immunity to which all citizens are entitled and that the Fourteenth Amendment did not add voting to basic citizenship rights. After this strategy failed, the National Woman Suffrage Association turned to promoting a national constitutional amendment to give women the vote.Ã This amendment did not pass until 1920, 14 years after Anthonys death and 18 years after Stantons death.
Posted by Hanna Schuster at 4:56 PM
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Utilitarianism Ã¢â¬Å"Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. We will write a custom essay sample on A Utilitarian Education or any similar topic only for you Order Now Sheds coat in springÃ¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ ¦ Ã¢â¬ A perfect example of a product of utilitarian education, Bitzer defines a horse off the top of his head in a split second. Utilitarianism is the assumption that human beings act in a way that highlights their own self interest. It is based on factuality and leaves little room for imagination. Dickens provides three vivid examples of this utilitarian logic in Hard Times. The first; Mr. Thomas Gradgrind, one of the main characters in the book, was the principal of a school in Coketown. He was a firm believer in utilitarianism and instilled this philosophy into the students at the school from a very young age, as well as his own children. Mr. Josiah Bounderby was also a practitioner of utilitarianism, but was more interested in the profit that stemmed from it. At the other end of the perspective, a group of circus members, who are the total opposite of utilitarians, are added by Dickens to provide a sharp contrast from the ideas of Mr. Bounderby and Mr. Gradgrind. Thomas Gradgrind Sr. a father of five children, has lived his life by the book and never strayed from his philosophy that life is nothing more than facts and statistics. He has successfully incorporated this belief into the school system of Coketown, and has tried his best to do so with his own children. The educators see children as easy targets just waiting to be filled with information. They did not consider, however, the childrenÃ¢â¬ s need for fiction, poetry, and other fine arts that are used to expand childrenÃ¢â¬ s minds, all of which are essential today in order to produce well-rounded human beings through the educational process. One has to wonder how different the story would be if Gradgrind did not run the school. How can you give a utilitarian man such as Gradgrind such power over a town? I do like how Dickens structures the book to make one ask obvious questions such as these. Dickens does not tell us much about the success of the other students of the school besides Bitzer, who is fairly successful on paper, but does not have the capacity as a person to deal with lifeÃ¢â¬ s everyday struggles. Gradgrinds two oldest children, Tom and Louisa, are examples of how this utilitarian method failed miserably. These children were never given the opportunity to think for themselves, experience fun things in life, or even use their imaginations. True, they are smart people in the factual sense but do not have the street smarts to survive. Tom is a young man who, so fed up with his fatherÃ¢â¬ s strictness and repetition, revolts against him and leaves home to work in Mr. BounderbyÃ¢â¬ s bank. Tom, now out from under his fathers wing, he begins to drink and gamble heavily. Eventually, to get out of a deep gambling debt, he robs a bank and is forced to flee the area. When Bitzer realizes that Tom has robbed the bank and catches him, Mr. Gradgrind begs him to let Tom go, reminding him of all of the hard work that was put on him while at the school. Ironically Bitzer, using the tools of factuality that he had learned in Gradgrinds school, replies that the school was paid for, but it is now over and he owes nothing more. I think this is extremely funny how, at a time of need, GradgrindÃ¢â¬ s educational theory has backfired in his face. I think Dickens put this irony in as a comical device but also to show how ineffective the utilitarian method of teaching is. Louisa, unlike Tom, does get along with her father. She even agrees to marry Mr. Bounderby, even though she does not love him, in order to please her father. She stays in the marriage with Bounderby, and goes about life normally and factually, until she is faced with a dilemma and panics. Mr. James Harthouse, a young, good looking guy, is attracted to Louisa and deceivingly draws her attraction to him. She does not know what to do since she has never had feelings of her own before. Her father never gave her the opportunity to think for herself, or even love someone. This is why Louisa goes frantic and ends up crying in her fathers lap. She has always been told what to do and what is Ã¢â¬ËrightÃ¢â¬ , and now even her father is stumped. For the first time in the whole novel, Mr. Gradgrind strays from the utilitarian philosophy and shows compassion for his daughter and her feelings. One must think that he is beginning to doubt his philosophy after seeing it backfire in his face more than once. Josiah Bounderby is another prime example of utilitarianism. He is one of the wealthiest people in Coketown; owning a bank and a factory, but is not really a likable person. His utilitarian philosophy is similar to Gradgrinds in the sense that factuality is the single most important virtue that one could posses. Mr. Bounderby maintained throughout the story his utilitarian views, which basically stated that nothing else is important besides profit. Being the owner of both a factory and a bank, Bounderby employs many workers, yet seems to offer them no respect at all. He refers to the factory workers as Ã¢â¬Å"Hands,Ã¢â¬ because that is all they are to him. Bounderby often states that workers are all looking for Ã¢â¬Å"venison, turtle soup, and a golden spoon,Ã¢â¬ while all they really want is decent working conditions and fair wage for their work. He is not concerned about his employees as human beings, but how much their hands can produce during the workday, resulting with money in his pocket. When one of his workers, Stephen Blackpool came to BounderbyÃ¢â¬ s house asking for advice about his bad marriage, he was treated as inferior just because of his social status. Dickens portrayed the scene as one in which Blackpool was on a level five steps below Bounderby and his associates because he was a lowly worker who was obviously much less educated than them. It almost seemed like they would not even take him seriously because he was such. Blackpool was told that he could not divorce his wife because it would be against the laws of England. Later in the book, Bounderby divorces his wife. This shows that wealth played a large role in determining the social classes that people were in and the privileges they had. This was definitely unfair but the social classes were structured in a way which allowed those who had money to look down upon those who were less fortunate. Generally, those who were not well-educated did not have any money, while the well-educated ones such as Bounderby and Gradgrind were wealthy. The people who knew the factual information, (utilitarians) were successful, while those who did not were reduced to working in the factories of the utilitarians. Dickens paints a vivid picture of this inequality between social classes and shows he does not care much for it. It is fairly easy to see that Dickens holds a contempt for Bounderby and the utilitarian philosophy he carries. The book details the philosophy, then shows how miserably it failed. How much different would their lives be if the town was not run by utilitarians. Dickens cleverly added in circus people as a contrast to the utilitarian approach to life. The circus people could be called the total opposite of utilitarianism. If one element of the book stands out in my mind, it would be this one. The circus people are simple, open-minded human beings whose goal in life is to make people laugh. Dickens portrays them as a step up from the Ã¢â¬Å"HandsÃ¢â¬ but still close to the bottom in the social structure. These people are hated by Gradgrind, Bounderby and other utilitarians because they represent everything that is shunned in utilitarianism such as love, imagination, and humor. Sissy Jupe, the daughter of a circus man, was taken in by the Gradgrinds to live in their home. She is representative of the circus people with her innocence and free-will, qualities which are lacking in the lives of the people around her. Just by her presence, her goodness rubs off on the people around her, although it is too late for most of them. Even after numerous attempts to force utilitarianism into her by Mr. Gradgrind and his school, she is still the fun-loving girl that she always was because she grew up living with Ã¢â¬Å"normalÃ¢â¬ people who thought for themselves and loved each other. She influenced these qualities on the youngest Gradgrind daughter Jane, who led a much more enjoyable and fulfilling life than her older sister Louisa because of those influences. Jane is not spoken of much until the end of the book but I like the way Dickens showed the effects of the utilitarian lifestyle as opposed to the non-utilitarian lifestyle. The utilitarians ultimately ended with a great downfall because their narrow-minds could not endure the pressures that life can impose on oneself. The people that did not fall victim to the utilitarian trap were able to live their lives happily and freely, able to love, laugh, and use their imagination; which is the way life ought to be lived. Dickens obviously had a definitive opinion of the way life should be lived and did an excellent job of depicting it. His method was somewhat indirect in the sense that he worked backwards to get his point across, but turned out to be very effective as the story progressed. Most of the story revolved around utilitarianism and the study of cold hard facts, but when the character flaws began to surface as a result of this philosophy, Dickens is quick to emphasize them. One actually sees the main character of the book and firm supporter of utilitarianism, Mr. Thomas Gradgrind, experience the faults of his practice and begin to stray from it. Now, after watching his life fall apart, maybe he wishes he were in the circus. How to cite A Utilitarian Education, Papers
Posted by Hanna Schuster at 11:30 AM
Thursday, April 30, 2020
An Expression of Love Essay Spanning just twelve lines and two stanzas, Eavan Bolands poem Ceres Looks at the Morning offers a rich amount of analogies to Greek mythology. She vividly shows her ideas and her life by linking them to myths such as the myth of Ceres and Persephone. In Ceres Looks at the Morning, Eavan Boland also expresses her experiences as a mother by superimposing herself onto a reminiscing Ceres.Plotted on the time-line of life, dawn represents new life, twilight represents senility, and darkness represents death. The lines Already / my body is a twilight: Solid. Cold symbolizes how the ordeal of Persephone and Hades had worn out Ceres. It also represents Bolands view of herself as worn out and exhausted from taking care of a daughter. In lines 8-12, the poet speaker compares her daughter to a beautiful morning. Just as the morning rose from the darkness, so had Bolands daughter come from the darkness of Bolands womb. As morning ultimately become day, her daughter will anticipate adulthood.Bol and utilizes several things from Greek mythology. Nyx, the goddess of darkness, plays an important, though mostly oblivious role in several myths. In the myth of Ceres and Persephone, Ceres, while looking for her daughter, carried torches during the day as she did during night, which showed that for her, day is as dark as night. In line 2, Nyx plays a similar role. Boland is so concerned about the well-being of her daughter that she lives in perpetual near-darkness. The apple trees in line 5 was associated with love in Greek mythology. It represents Bolands love for her daughter. The lines Light is pouring / into the promise of fruit shows that Boland thinks that her daughter is living up to her expectations.Bolands choice of words and syntax reveals her feelings. In the beginning of the poem, 1st person nouns are predominant, but towards the end, the dominant pronoun is 3rd person. This can be view as Boland imparting her wisdom to her daughter, and also as a shift of attention fro m her to her daughter. The line I wake slowly shows that she is living in the moment instead of remembering the past. Boland views herself in the present tense, but refers to her daughter in the past and future tense. This shows that Boland feels that her daughter completes and complements her.Ceres Looks at the Morning is a poem filled with unique and fascinating details of Bolands feelings and her life. Not only is the poem a homage to Ceres, but it is also an ode to all mothers. Deep in meaning and symbols, Ceres Looks at the Morning is an outstanding poem in the genre of poem about the myth of Ceres and Persephone.
Posted by Hanna Schuster at 9:46 PM